Felistas Wanjiru v Priscilla Wairimu [2020] eKLR Case Summary

Court
High Court of Kenya at Kiambu
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
C. Meoli
Judgment Date
October 09, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
2
Explore the Felistas Wanjiru v Priscilla Wairimu [2020] eKLR case summary, detailing key legal principles and outcomes essential for understanding this ruling.

Case Brief: Felistas Wanjiru v Priscilla Wairimu [2020] eKLR

1. Case Information:
- Name of the Case: Felistas Wanjiru v. Priscilla Wairimu
- Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 138 of 2019
- Court: High Court of Kenya at Kiambu
- Date Delivered: 9th October 2020
- Category of Law: Civil
- Judge(s): C. Meoli
- Country: Kenya

2. Questions Presented:
The central legal issue presented to the court was whether the Appellant's memorandum of appeal and motion for stay of execution could be entertained, given the Respondent's preliminary objection asserting that the court lacked jurisdiction due to the Appellant's failure to obtain leave to appeal.

3. Facts of the Case:
The Appellant, Felistas Wanjiru, filed an appeal against the Respondent, Priscilla Wairimu, following a ruling delivered by the lower court on 30th August 2019 and a judgment on 22nd June 2019. The Respondent raised a preliminary objection arguing that the appeal was filed out of time regarding the judgment and that the Appellant needed leave to appeal the ruling. The Appellant contended that she did not require such leave and that her appeal was timely.

4. Procedural History:
The case began with the Respondent's preliminary objection filed on 28th October 2019, which challenged the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the appeal. The Appellant opposed this objection by filing grounds of opposition on 18th February 2020. The court directed that the preliminary objection be argued orally. The Respondent's counsel argued that the Appellant's appeal was time-barred and lacked the requisite leave, while the Appellant's counsel maintained that the appeal was timely and valid.

5. Analysis:
- Rules: The court considered Order 42 Rule 6(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, which stipulates that a valid and competent appeal is a prerequisite for any motion seeking to stay execution. Additionally, Section 75 and Order 43 of the Civil Procedure Rules were relevant, as they indicate that appeals from certain orders do not lie as of right but require leave.
- Case Law: The court referenced *Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Company Ltd v. West End Distributors Ltd* (1969) EA 696, which defined a preliminary objection as a pure point of law. It also cited *Edith Wairimu Njoroge v. Brooks Holdings Co. Ltd* [2018] e KLR, emphasizing that leave is necessary for appeals from orders not permitted as of right. Furthermore, *Kakuta Maimai Hamisi v. Peris Pesi Tobiko & 2 Others* [2013] e KLR highlighted the fundamental nature of the right of appeal concerning the court's jurisdiction.
- Application: The court applied these rules and case law to the facts of the case, concluding that the Appellant's memorandum of appeal was incompetent since it sought to challenge a ruling and a judgment without obtaining the required leave. Consequently, the court found that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and the motion for stay of execution.

6. Conclusion:
The court ruled that the Appellant's memorandum of appeal and motion for stay of execution were incompetent and struck them out. The court emphasized the necessity of obtaining leave for appeals in such circumstances, reaffirming the importance of jurisdictional prerequisites in civil appeals.

7. Dissent:
There were no dissenting opinions in this case, as the ruling was unanimous.

8. Summary:
The High Court of Kenya ruled in favor of the Respondent, striking out the Appellant's appeal and motion for stay of execution due to lack of jurisdiction stemming from the Appellant's failure to seek the necessary leave to appeal. This case underscores the critical importance of adhering to procedural requirements in civil appeals and the court's jurisdictional limitations.

Document Summary

Below is the summary preview of this document.

  • Felistas-Wanjiru-v-Priscilla-Wairimu-[2020]-eKLR-Case-Summary_1694_0.jpg

This is the end of the summary preview.

Related Documents

View all summaries